🇭🇺 Hungary · 🇱🇻 Latvia
By Priya Mehta, The Global Office
Both countries will hand you a laptop, a badge, and a brisk safety briefing on your first day. Neither will tell you, out loud, that the real onboarding — the one where someone senior decides you're worth their time — happens off the org chart entirely, on a timeline you don't control and can't ask about directly.
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Expect a reserved, formal welcome at first — warmth comes later, once trust is established | Mistake initial reserve for unfriendliness; it typically thaws within the first weeks |
| Address managers and senior colleagues formally until explicitly invited to informality | Assume first-name, low-formality norms apply from day one |
| Ask direct, specific questions about role expectations — Hungarians respect precision | Expect to be asked for your opinion in early meetings; contribute once you understand the hierarchy |
| Take direct, technical feedback as factual assessment, not personal criticism | Interpret bluntness as hostility — it's usually just Hungarian candor |
| Build one-on-one rapport with a potential mentor deliberately — it rarely happens automatically | Wait passively for a formal mentorship structure to appear; many companies don't have one |
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Use surnames and titles in early interactions until a closer relationship forms | Default to casual first-name address before it's offered to you |
| Expect a genuine pairing with an experienced colleague if the company runs formal onboarding | Assume informal onboarding means no one is quietly evaluating your fit |
| Communicate concisely — Latvians value clarity and dislike padded requests | Over-explain simple requests; brevity reads as competence, not curtness |
| Show reliability and follow-through early — it's the fastest route to being trusted with more | Expect quick personal warmth; Latvian workplace culture prizes self-control and privacy |
| Respect the quiet, understated pace of relationship-building | Push for fast personal familiarity — it can read as presumptuous |
Hungarian workplaces are, by most business-culture accounts, hierarchically structured and formally coded at the outset: Commisceo Global's management guide notes employees are generally not expected to offer opinions during decision-making, and that the sensible early strategy is establishing respectful, formal relationships with the managers who will make the calls. Cultural Atlas and multiple business guides describe a genuine paradox here — Hungarians are reserved on first meeting but, once the ice breaks, notably direct and even passionate, with feedback that can land as blunt or technical to outsiders even though it's intended as straightforward assessment rather than criticism. Onboarding itself, per guides like Bradford Jacobs, typically includes mandatory practical elements (safety briefings, role training) alongside softer cultural integration — communication norms, working hours, dress code — but formal mentorship programs are inconsistently implemented; where they exist, research cited by onboarding-industry sources shows dramatically better retention (72% for mentored new hires versus 49% without), which is precisely why relying on one appearing automatically is a bad bet.
Latvia's onboarding culture shares Hungary's formal opening posture — titles and surnames are standard until a closer relationship is established — but layers on something distinctly Baltic: a cultural premium on privacy, self-control, and quiet reliability over performed warmth. Rivermate's cultural guide describes Latvian workplace values as blending hierarchy, responsibility, and "quiet resilience," with direct, efficient communication expected even as interpersonal warmth is withheld until earned. Where formal onboarding programs exist, pairing new hires with an experienced team member is a recommended and reasonably common practice, particularly in manufacturing and technical roles per Baltic-region research — but the broader cultural expectation is that a new employee demonstrates competence and reliability quietly, through consistent output, rather than through visible social integration efforts.
The Reckoning
The Morning Brief
Enjoying this? Get it in your inbox.
Both countries share an instructive contradiction: formal HR onboarding — paperwork, safety briefings, system access — is thorough and well-documented in both, while the informal onboarding that actually determines whether you thrive is opaque, unscheduled, and entirely dependent on you reading a room neither country will explicitly coach you through. Hungary rewards a new hire who becomes direct and engaged once trust is built; Latvia rewards one who stays quietly, consistently reliable and never oversteps into premature familiarity. Get the sequencing backward — direct and outspoken too early in Budapest, or performatively warm too early in Riga — and you'll read as presumptuous in both, for opposite-looking reasons.
The other contrast worth noting: Hungary's directness, once trust exists, can feel almost cathartic after the initial formality — colleagues who seemed distant in week one can become candid, even blunt, collaborators by month two. Latvia's trajectory is flatter; the shift from formal to familiar happens more gradually and rarely tips into the kind of frank bluntness Hungarian colleagues consider normal. If you're optimizing for "when will this feel like a real relationship," Hungary likely gets there faster, but on a less predictable timeline; Latvia gets there slower, but more evenly.
Quora — Someone answering "what is it like to be an expat in Hungary" noted that the biggest early misread wasn't the language barrier but assuming initial coolness from colleagues meant disinterest — several weeks in, the same colleagues turned out to be warm, direct, and genuinely invested, just not from day one.
Quora — A respondent describing life in Budapest observed that younger Hungarian colleagues were far more eager to build informal mentorship relationships than older ones, and that seeking out a peer close to your own career stage was often a faster path to real guidance than waiting for management to assign one.
Quora — Someone who moved to Latvia as an immigrant described the experience as "a mixed bag" depending heavily on effort put into learning Latvian — colleagues who saw genuine language effort extended noticeably more informal warmth and inclusion than those who defaulted to English.
Rivermate cultural guide (Latvia) — One cited account described the shift from formal surname address to first-name familiarity with Latvian colleagues as happening almost imperceptibly, with no clear signal it had occurred — the safest approach was simply mirroring whatever the other person used first.
Cultural Atlas business-culture notes (Hungary) — A described scenario involved a foreign manager softening critical feedback out of politeness, only for Hungarian staff to read the vagueness as evasive or untrustworthy — direct, specific feedback was received far better than the diplomatically hedged version.
If you're weighing these two, the practical test is which kind of silence you're better at reading: Hungary's initial reserve that's secretly waiting to become blunt candor, or Latvia's steady, understated privacy that may never fully become anything else. Neither country will onboard your social integration for you — the paperwork gets done either way, but the mentor, if you get one, is something you'll have to notice you're building, one quiet interaction at a time. My honest advice over drinks: in Hungary, be patient and then be direct; in Latvia, just be reliable and let that speak for itself.
Subscriber Only
Subscribe to The Alignment Times and get every article delivered to your inbox.
Photo by cottonbro studio via Pexels
Priya Mehta
Staff writer covering financial markets and corporate strategy. Has strong opinions about spreadsheets.