🇹🇭 Thailand · 🇨🇦 Canada
By Priya Mehta, The Global Office
In Thailand, ordering just one dish for yourself at lunch is almost socially odd — the norm is a group ordering several dishes for the table so everyone tries a little of everything, even on an ordinary workday (general cultural sourcing / Remitly). In Canada, a Dalhousie University study found that nearly 40% of Canadians eat lunch at their desks, with the figure closer to 50% in Atlantic Canada, and 72% of workers pack their own lunch rather than share a meal with colleagues at all (CBC News / Dalhousie). One culture treats the workday meal as inherently communal. The other has, without much fanfare, turned lunch into a private, often solitary logistics problem.
[IMAGE_1]
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Say yes when colleagues offer you food from a shared order — it's a bonding gesture | Order just for yourself when the table is clearly sharing multiple dishes |
| Follow the office-worker lines at street stalls — a reliable sign of quality | Assume street food is unsafe just because it's informal or cheap |
| Embrace the concept of sanook (fun) — joining group lunches matters socially | Treat lunch as purely functional; declining regularly reads as standoffish |
| Try what's offered even if unfamiliar — it signals openness | Make a visible face of disgust at unfamiliar dishes, even if you don't finish them |
| Expect lunch to double as informal team bonding, not just a break | Rush colleagues through a shared meal — it's meant to be unhurried |
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Pack your own lunch if you want to fit the majority norm | Assume eating at your desk is rude — it's close to standard practice |
| Respect that eating alone is common and not a social signal of exclusion | Read a colleague's solo desk lunch as a rejection of your company |
| Expect real cuisine diversity — Canadian "default" food barely exists | Assume there's one "typical" Canadian lunch to benchmark against |
| Take a proper lunch break occasionally if you want relationship-building time | Assume desk-eating peers will always initiate a shared meal instead |
| Notice regional variation — Atlantic Canada eats at desks even more than the rest | Assume Toronto or Vancouver norms apply uniformly nationwide |
Thai food culture treats the shared table as close to a social institution, and it survives intact even in a fast-moving urban work environment. Street food functions as breakfast, lunch, and dinner for much of the population, with stalls clustered outside office blocks selling pad thai, khao man gai, and curry rice specifically to workers on tight lunch windows (general cultural sourcing). What distinguishes it from a simple grab-and-go culture is the persistence of communal ordering even under time pressure — friends and coworkers eating "casually" still default to a shared table of dishes rather than individual orders, an arrangement sourced from an FAO-supported Bangkok street food initiative dating back to 1994 that formalized safety standards around exactly this kind of daily communal eating. The workplace concept of sanook, loosely "fun," extends into how seriously colleagues treat these shared meals: joining in isn't just about food, it's read as a signal of whether you're willing to participate in the social fabric of the office (GoAbroad).
Canada's picture is fragmented by design, both culturally and structurally. Multicultural immigration has left the country without a strong unifying "national" food identity at work — Indigenous, French, Italian, Chinese, Vietnamese, Indian, and Caribbean influences all compete for the office microwave with roughly equal legitimacy (Canada Food Guide). What's more striking than the diversity, though, is what Dalhousie University's research revealed about the eating pattern itself: desk-eating isn't a minority habit but close to a defining one, and lead researcher Sylvain Charlebois described it as a direct symptom of workplace pressure, noting that "to take the time to go eat any meal at work is slowly becoming a luxury" (CBC News). The same research found a self-reinforcing dynamic — when even one employee, especially a manager, eats at their desk, it creates informal pressure on others to do the same to visibly "prove" their work ethic, turning a personal choice into an office-wide norm.
The Morning Brief
Enjoying this? Get it in your inbox.
The genuine surprise isn't that Thailand shares food and Canada doesn't — that fits the stereotype. It's that Canada's individualism around lunch isn't really a preference so much as an unspoken workplace pressure mechanic, the same way Thailand's communal eating isn't really about the food so much as a continuous, low-stakes test of social participation. A newcomer who "correctly" reads Thailand's lunch culture as purely nutritional will miss the relationship-building actually happening at the table. A newcomer who reads Canada's desk-lunch culture as unfriendly will misdiagnose what's actually workplace intensity being expressed through a sandwich, not a judgment about them personally.
[IMAGE_2]
Quora — Someone describing the typical Canadian office worker's lunch noted it usually comes down to one of two things: a packed lunch eaten in a cubicle, or a quick run to a fast-food chain — a routine several respondents agreed felt more about efficiency than any deliberate food culture.
InterNations — A foreign professional working in Bangkok described being handed a plate from a coworker's shared order on their very first day without being asked, and realizing only weeks later that consistently trying what's offered had become the single biggest factor in how quickly the team warmed up to them.
A recurring theme in accounts from interns and junior staff in Bangkok: declining group lunches repeatedly, even for legitimate reasons like dietary restrictions, was noticed and gently commented on by colleagues in a way that made clear participation itself mattered more than the food.
CBC News (reporting on Dalhousie University research) — Lead researcher Sylvain Charlebois found that desk-eating in Canada functions partly as unspoken competitive signaling, where one visibly hardworking employee eating at their desk creates quiet pressure on peers to match the behavior rather than take an actual break.
A common observation among expats moving from more communal food cultures to Canada: the absence of an expected shared lunch ritual initially read as coldness, but was more accurately described by long-term residents as simply low collective pressure to eat together — an absence of expectation rather than active avoidance.
If you're moving to Thailand, treat every shared meal as a small but real opportunity to build workplace trust, and decline sparingly. If you're moving to Canada, don't take a quiet desk lunch personally — it's closer to a symptom of workplace intensity than a social rejection, and if you want relationship-building time with colleagues, you'll likely need to propose it rather than wait for it to happen organically. The honest tip: in Thailand, order for the table; in Canada, don't be afraid to eat alone — just make sure you're occasionally the one who suggests lunch out, because no one else is going to.
Subscriber Only
Subscribe to The Alignment Times and get every article delivered to your inbox.
Priya Mehta
Staff writer covering financial markets and corporate strategy. Has strong opinions about spreadsheets.