🇹🇼 Taiwan · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
By Priya Mehta, The Global Office
No news is good news in a Taipei office — hear nothing, and you're doing fine. In an Amsterdam office, no news is close to the worst possible sign: the Dutch rule of thumb, repeated by nearly every expat guide, is that colleagues only bother criticizing people they still believe can improve. Silence isn't neutral in either country. It just means the exact opposite thing.
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Prepare a written "accomplishment list" ahead of your one or two annual reviews — impact and supporting data, not just tasks | Show up expecting a casual, conversational review with no documentation |
| Deliver any criticism privately, one-on-one, never in a group setting | Correct a colleague's work in front of the team, even gently |
| Read "no news" as a genuinely good sign, not an information gap to chase down | Repeatedly ask your manager for feedback they haven't volunteered — it can read as insecure or pushy |
| Treat visible long hours and consistent presence as a real signal of commitment that gets noticed | Assume your output alone speaks for itself if your hours look different from the team's norm |
| Communicate disagreement in person, not in writing, to avoid tone being misread | Send a pointed email raising a disagreement — written criticism is easy to misinterpret |
| Expect flexible/remote arrangements only at more progressive, internationally-facing companies | Assume the newer work-life-integration trend applies uniformly across all employers |
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Expect direct, real-time feedback — including in front of the team — as completely normal | Interpret open criticism as a personal attack or a sign you're in trouble |
| Take "completely" and "absolutely" in feedback as ordinary intensity, not an alarm bell | Read blunt language as unusually harsh compared to what's actually intended |
| Push back on a manager's idea in a meeting if you disagree — flat hierarchy genuinely invites it | Stay quiet out of deference to seniority; it can read as disengaged |
| Use first names with leadership from day one in most companies | Default to titles and last names, assuming formality signals respect here |
| Treat consistent silence from a manager as a real warning sign worth addressing directly | Assume no news is fine and wait for a formal review cycle to check in |
| Expect genuinely strong work-life balance norms — the Netherlands ranks near the top of the OECD on this | Plan on the long-hours culture common elsewhere in Europe |
Taiwan's feedback culture is shaped directly by Confucian values around harmony and face — concepts that show up in Hofstede's numbers as a striking combination: individualism of just 17 (strongly collectivist) alongside a long-term orientation score of 93, among the highest measured anywhere. In practice, that translates into a formal review cadence — once or twice a year, built around a documented "accomplishment list" the employee prepares themselves — layered on top of an everyday communication norm where negative comments are deliberately kept out of group settings. Commisceo Global's management guide is blunt about the mechanism: written criticism is genuinely risky in Taiwanese workplaces because tone is easy to misread on paper, so anything sensitive gets handled face-to-face, in private, specifically to preserve the chance to clarify and avoid embarrassment. The flip side, widely reported by relocation guides, is that Taiwanese managers historically default to silence rather than proactive feedback — "no news is good news" — a norm imported wholesale from a culture where actively demanding feedback the way an American or Dutch employee might isn't the expected move at all.
The Netherlands sits at almost the opposite pole. Erin Meyer's cross-cultural feedback research consistently places Dutch communication at the most direct end of the negative-feedback spectrum globally, alongside Israel and Russia — criticism delivered openly, sometimes in front of the team, using intensifying language ("completely," "absolutely") rather than softened with praise on either side. Crucially, multiple Dutch workplace guides frame this not as coldness but as a specific cultural logic: directness is treated as respect, an assumption that the recipient is capable of hearing accurate information and improving from it. That logic pairs with genuinely flat organizational structures — first names with senior leadership, junior employees expected to push back on ideas in meetings — and with a work-life balance regime that's a statistical outlier even within Europe: just 0.4% of Dutch employees regularly work very long hours, against an OECD average near 11%, and the Netherlands sits at the top of the OECD's Better Life Index for work-life balance.
The Morning Brief
Enjoying this? Get it in your inbox.
The Reckoning: The real trap isn't the obvious one (Taiwan indirect, Netherlands direct) — it's what each culture does with silence. A Taiwanese employee moving to an Amsterdam office and hearing nothing from their manager for weeks might reasonably relax, the way they would at home; in Dutch workplace logic, that same silence is a red flag worth raising themselves, since Dutch managers who've mentally written someone off often simply stop engaging rather than escalate. Inversely, a Dutch manager transplanted to Taipei who delivers blunt, public feedback intending to show respect for their team's ability to handle it risks producing exactly the embarrassment Taiwanese workplace norms are built to avoid — the same gesture, read as care in one office, reads as a serious misstep in the other.
Quora — Answering a thread on the biggest culture shocks people face moving to Taiwan, several respondents pointed specifically to the workplace: negative feedback essentially never surfaces in group settings, and newcomers used to actively soliciting feedback in performance conversations elsewhere found the Taiwanese default of waiting to be told disorienting until they learned to read the absence of comment as the actual signal.
Traveling Kunz (Taiwan work-life blog) — A foreign employee's account of "the good, the bad, and the ugly" of Taiwanese office life singled out expected overtime and a near-total absence of home-office flexibility as the hardest adjustments, alongside a warning that some traditional workplaces still carried real verbal-abuse problems from senior staff — not universal, but not rare enough to dismiss either.
IamExpat.nl — A feature on Dutch culture shock "nobody really explains" focused heavily on directness in professional settings, describing newcomers from indirect-communication cultures initially reading blunt Dutch feedback as aggression before realizing, often only after an uncomfortable first review cycle, that the bluntness carried no hidden judgment at all.
Charmingmarie (personal relocation blog, Netherlands) — Among a list of biggest culture shocks moving to the Netherlands, the writer described a specific early meeting where a junior colleague openly disagreed with a senior manager's proposal in front of the whole team — an interaction that, from a more hierarchical professional background, initially read as a serious breach of protocol rather than the unremarkable, expected exchange Dutch colleagues treated it as.
Dutch On Track (language and culture knowledge base, drawing on client coaching sessions) — Coaches working with newly arrived professionals repeatedly identified the same recovery pattern: clients who initially found Dutch directness distressing came to describe it, within a matter of months, as more efficient than the softened feedback style they'd left behind — the adjustment period, not the directness itself, was consistently the harder part.
If you're moving into a Taiwanese office, the operating rule is: silence is safety, and any correction you need to give goes into a private room, never a group chat. If you're moving into a Dutch one, the rule inverts completely: silence is the warning sign, and the blunt feedback you're bracing for is, by local standards, a form of respect. The line I'd give a friend heading into either: in Taipei, stop waiting to be told you're doing well — assume it until told otherwise. In Amsterdam, stop waiting to be told you're doing poorly — ask, because nobody's going to soften it for you either way.
Subscriber Only
Subscribe to The Alignment Times and get every article delivered to your inbox.
Photo by cottonbro studio via Pexels
Priya Mehta
Staff writer covering financial markets and corporate strategy. Has strong opinions about spreadsheets.