🇰🇷 South Korea · 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
By Priya Mehta, The Global Office
More than half of Korean office workers aged 30 to 50 — 53.4%, per a recent survey — now report witnessing the "Gen Z stare," the blank, unresponsive look a younger colleague gives when asked to do something they consider unreasonable. A Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry survey found 42.8% of employees in their 50s think overtime is simply part of good performance, against just 26.9% of those in their 20s. Move to London, and the same generational standoff plays out with more vocabulary and less staring — British Gen Z workers are just as likely to push back, they simply do it in a full sentence, often with a joke attached. Both countries are negotiating the same handover of workplace power. Only one of them has given it a meme.
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Offer lunchtime team gatherings as the default social event | Assume evening hoesik (drinking dinners) are still mandatory — both MZ and older workers now increasingly prefer daytime alternatives |
| Explain the reasoning behind seniority-based decisions when working with younger staff | Assume the traditional age-hierarchy still runs unquestioned — roughly 65% of MZ-generation workers now believe seniority culture actively harms organizational efficiency |
| Respect the 52-hour weekly work limit as a hard boundary, not a guideline | Expect unpaid "extra" work as an unstated norm — quiet quitting has taken root specifically as a rejection of that expectation |
| Read a younger employee's flat expression as information, not insubordination | Mistake the "Gen Z stare" for disrespect — over a quarter of workers who report seeing it attribute it to poor communication skills, not defiance |
| Separate personal and professional time explicitly | Assume younger staff will treat after-hours messages as normal — the demand for a clear line between work and personal life is now a defining MZ value |
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Expect employees to manage their own workload and take initiative without being told | Micromanage junior staff — British professional norms assume competence and independence by default |
| Use dry humor to build rapport, cautiously, once you know the room | Mistake British sarcasm for hostility, or assume it translates the same way to every generational cohort in the office |
| Offer flexible or hybrid arrangements explicitly | Assume all generations want the same setup — millennials lean toward fully remote, while Gen Z leans hybrid, and treating the two as interchangeable causes real friction |
| Invest time in after-work socializing — it's a genuine relationship-building norm, not optional | Skip the small talk and go straight to business, especially with older colleagues who read it as a trust-building ritual |
| Frame career development conversations explicitly, especially with millennial staff | Assume career progression conversations will be volunteered — millennials are 17 percentage points more likely than older colleagues to actively seek them out |
South Korea's generational shift is happening inside a culture that, per Hofstede Insights, still scores a firmly collectivist 18 on individualism and a comparatively high 60 on power distance — deference to hierarchy remains the structural default, which is precisely what makes the MZ generation's quiet resistance to it so pointed. The "Gen Z stare" phenomenon captures the mechanism perfectly: rather than verbally challenging an unreasonable request, younger employees simply withhold the expected deferential response, and older colleagues experience the silence as more unsettling than an argument would be.
The generational math backs up the mood. Korean employees still worked an average of 36.8 hours a week in 2023 — well above Nordic benchmarks — but the culture of unpaid "extra" hours is visibly eroding: quiet quitting, defined here specifically as performing prescribed duties without volunteering uncompensated overtime, has become a mainstream MZ response rather than a fringe one. Hoesik, the once-mandatory evening drinking dinner, is fading fast enough that a Korea Institute of Public Administration survey found both MZ and older workers now prefer lunchtime team events — a rare point of generational agreement, arrived at from opposite directions.
British generational friction runs on a subtler register. Hofstede scores the UK at a low 35 on power distance and a striking 89 on individualism — a culture that assumes independence and initiative from employees at every level, which shows up directly in workplace guidance telling newcomers to manage their own workload and take initiative "without being told." Where Korea's hierarchy is explicit and its resistance is silent, Britain's hierarchy is understated and its friction is verbal — usually delivered through the dry wit and sarcasm that function as a genuine social tool for easing tension and signaling comfort, a register that lands very differently depending on which generation is on the receiving end.
The Morning Brief
Enjoying this? Get it in your inbox.
The Gallup and Deloitte data sketch a familiar UK pattern: Gen Z and younger millennials report 54% "not engaged" at work, roughly matching the global figure, while millennials specifically are 17 percentage points more likely than older colleagues to seek out career development conversations and eight points more likely to want remote work outright. Technology adoption splits cleanly too — only 56% of boomers describe adapting to new workplace tools as easy, against 77% of millennials and 68% of Gen Z, a gap that shows up constantly in which generation is expected to explain the new software to whom.
Both countries are watching younger employees reclaim time and boundaries from older colleagues who spent their own careers not asking for either — Korea through withdrawal and silence, Britain through direct, often humor-cushioned pushback. The Korean version is more visually dramatic (a coined term, a viral survey statistic, a specific facial expression now discussed in corporate HR meetings); the British version is quieter precisely because British workplace culture already ran on understatement, so the generational shift barely changes the register, just who's driving the conversation.
Where the two genuinely diverge is what "respect" costs. In Korea, respect is still primarily behavioral and hierarchical — attendance, deference, correct forms of address — even as MZ workers erode its content from within. In the UK, respect was already earned through competence and independent output; the generational argument there isn't about whether to defer to authority, since British culture never asked for much of that to begin with, but about how much emotional labor (career mentorship, explicit feedback, technology support) senior staff owe junior staff in return.
Korea Herald — A piece on the "Gen Z stare" quoted office workers describing the reaction less as rebellion than exhaustion, with younger staff explaining that a blank look was simply what was left once they'd stopped performing enthusiasm they didn't feel about unreasonable last-minute requests.
Quora — Someone answering a question about South Korea's quiet quitting trend described it as workers in their 20s and 30s finally testing whether stability actually required the corporate devotion their parents had assumed was non-negotiable, and finding, mostly, that it didn't.
Internations / CRCC Asia UK guide — A foreign intern in London wrote that the hardest early skill wasn't the work itself but decoding when a British colleague's polite, dry comment in a meeting was actually a firm objection — a lesson usually learned only after missing one.
Reddit — A Korean office worker in their late 20s described choosing a lunchtime team outing over a hoesik dinner as the first time in their career a scheduling preference from their generation was simply accepted rather than negotiated, and said it felt like a bigger shift than any headline had suggested.
Blind — A UK-based employee who'd previously worked in Seoul said the biggest adjustment moving to a London office wasn't the hours, which were shorter, but the loss of hierarchy as an excuse — in Korea, seniority explained who did what; in London, everyone was expected to just know, and asking too often read as a competence problem rather than a cultural one.
The practical read for anyone managing across these two cultures: in Korea, the generational shift is about what younger workers will no longer silently perform, so build explicit boundaries — daytime team events, respected overtime limits, stated reasoning for hierarchy — rather than waiting for the stare to tell you something's wrong. In the UK, the shift is about who gets to ask for career support out loud, so don't assume British reserve means indifference to growth or recognition. If a friend asked me over a drink, I'd say: in Seoul, watch the silence; in London, listen for the joke that isn't quite a joke.
Subscriber Only
Subscribe to The Alignment Times and get every article delivered to your inbox.
Photo by Aathif Aarifeen via Pexels
Priya Mehta
Staff writer covering financial markets and corporate strategy. Has strong opinions about spreadsheets.