🇬🇷 Greece · 🇷🇴 Romania
By Priya Mehta, The Global Office
Gallup's latest global workplace survey puts Greek employee engagement at 14 percent and workplace stress at 61 percent — the highest in Europe — while Romania, a country with a considerably more hierarchical management culture on paper, posts an engagement rate of 31 percent, among the strongest in the region. If your working theory was that flatter hierarchies and warmer relationships produce happier employees, Greece and Romania would like a word, delivered in two entirely different registers.
According to ELSTAT's labour force data, employment in Greece rose 3.1 percent year-on-year through the back half of 2025 and youth unemployment fell to 21.4 percent, its lowest since 2009 — genuine progress after a lost decade, though the OECD still flags a 17.4 percentage-point gender employment gap and persistently low workforce participation among women and older workers. None of that shows up on your performance review, because in Greece, the review itself is often less a data exercise than a relationship audit. Commisceo Global's management guide to Greece describes a culture where decisions flow top-down and feedback is delivered indirectly to avoid open conflict — a diplomatic way of saying your manager will imply displeasure long before stating it.
Formality also scales with company size: larger multinationals run structured appraisal cycles, while smaller and family-owned firms — still the backbone of the Greek economy — tend to run performance management on vibes, seniority, and the owner's mood. The Greek Analyst, a Substack chronicling domestic workplace grievances, put it more bluntly: a large share of Greek managers, particularly at family businesses, are simply not good at managing people, and reviews function less as development tools than as tests of allegiance. Recognition and titles carry outsized weight here — a plaque or a promotion in title often lands better than a modest raise, a point echoed across HR literature on Greek employee motivation.
Romania tells a different story economically. Eurostat put the January 2025 minimum wage at €814 a month against Greece's €968, and Romania's hourly labour costs, at €13.6, are the second-lowest in the EU after Bulgaria — yet median gross hourly earnings in the two countries are nearly identical, at 9.9 PPS for Romania versus 9.8 for Greece, once purchasing power is accounted for. On Hofstede Insights' cultural dimension scores, Romania records a power distance index of 90 against Greece's 60, alongside a strikingly low individualism score of 30 — a textbook hierarchical, collectivist profile. And yet Deloitte's 2025 Global Human Capital Trends research found that only about a third of executives worldwide trust their own performance management systems to drive good decisions, with 61 percent of managers and 72 percent of workers expressing outright distrust of the process — a global malaise Romania is not spared, even as its engagement numbers outperform the region.
The lived experience, per posts on the Expat.com Romania forum, is a workplace where hierarchy is respected without much debate, but where feedback — once it starts flowing — arrives with direct eye contact, treated locally as a marker of honesty rather than aggression. Multinationals in Bucharest and Cluj-Napoca run formal, KPI-driven review cycles; smaller Romanian firms rely more on frequent informal check-ins, because, forum contributors note, Romanian employees tend to need more regular positive reinforcement to stay motivated than a once-a-year verdict can provide.
The Morning Brief
Enjoying this? Get it in your inbox.
Put the two side by side and the irony sharpens: the country with the higher power-distance score and the more rigid org chart is also the one where employees report being more engaged, while the more relationship-driven, ostensibly less hierarchical Greek workplace produces both the lowest engagement and the highest stress levels measured anywhere in Europe. The lesson is not that hierarchy breeds happiness — it's that ambiguity is worse than either. Greek workers report high stress partly because feedback is withheld or coded, leaving people to guess where they stand; Romanian workers, even inside a steep hierarchy, at least know the shape of the conversation coming.
Neither system is optimizing for the employee's inbox. Greek reviews optimize for keeping the peace and preserving the relationship; Romanian reviews optimize for clarity within an accepted chain of command. An expat parachuting into either expecting an Anglo-American 360-degree, competency-matrix performance cycle will find both disorienting, just in opposite directions — one too soft to parse, one too direct to soften.
Quora — An expat working at a mid-sized Greek firm described their first annual review as forty-five minutes of small talk about family and loyalty to the company, with no mention of targets, metrics, or the raise they'd hoped to discuss — they left unsure whether it had gone well or badly.
Expat.com forum — A newcomer to a Romanian office gave a colleague pointed, American-style critical feedback in a team meeting, intending it as constructive; the colleague went quiet for weeks afterward, and it took a local friend explaining that criticism belongs in private, one-on-one, to repair the working relationship.
Quora — A foreign hire in Bucharest described being unsettled at first by a manager's blunt, unblinking feedback delivered in a one-on-one, then realizing over time that the direct eye contact and plain language were the local signal for respect and honesty, not confrontation.
The Greek Analyst (Substack) — A commentary on Greek workplace culture noted that at many family-owned businesses, performance conversations function less as development tools and more as informal loyalty checks, with actual promotion decisions often decided well before any review takes place.
Commisceo Global — Guidance on managing in Greece observed that public recognition and formal titles motivate Greek employees more reliably than cash bonuses alone, advising managers to build acknowledgment into team settings rather than reserving it for private conversations.
If you're landing a job offer in Athens, lower your expectations for a data-rich review and raise them for reading the room — ask directly about compensation, because no one is going to volunteer it, and treat any public praise as more meaningful than it sounds. If you're headed to Bucharest, prepare an honest self-assessment with real numbers, keep your composure when feedback lands more bluntly than you expected, and remember that respecting the hierarchy is not the same as being unable to disagree within it — you just do so upward, not sideways.
Both countries, in their own way, prove that "feedback culture" is a euphemism doing a great deal of work: in Greece it means managing a relationship, in Romania it means managing a conversation. Neither has quite gotten around to managing performance.
Subscriber Only
Subscribe to The Alignment Times and get every article delivered to your inbox.
Photo by Vlada Karpovich via Pexels
Priya Mehta
Staff writer covering financial markets and corporate strategy. Has strong opinions about spreadsheets.