🇬🇧 UK · 🇨🇳 China
By Priya Mehta, The Global Office
In Great Britain, 28 percent of adults worked hybrid between January and March 2025, and since April 2024 every employee has had the legal right to request flexible work from their first day on the job. In China, remote job postings crept from 0.14 percent of listings in 2019 to a still-modest 0.58 percent in 2021, and the phrase workers reach for to describe pandemic-era remote work was "996 in your living room" — the same brutal 9am-to-9pm, six-day cadence, just with a worse internet connection and no formal lunch break. Flexibility, it turns out, is not a technology problem. It is a trust problem, and the two countries have answered it in opposite directions.
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Submit a flexible working request in writing if you want it formally protected | Assume flexible work is a favor — since 2024 it's a day-one legal right to request |
| Use hybrid days deliberately — many teams cluster in-office time around meetings | Assume "hybrid" means you can pick days at random with no coordination |
| Set clear boundaries on your home-working hours | Feel obligated to be visibly online outside agreed hours just to prove you're working |
| Ask your manager to clarify reasonable grounds if a request is refused | Assume refusal is final — employers must show specific, listed business reasons |
| Lean into it — 87% of UK employees prefer hybrid or remote setups | Treat remote work as a controversial ask; it's now closer to a baseline expectation |
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Expect in-office presence to be the default, especially at larger firms | Assume remote work is broadly normalized — postings for it remain a small minority |
| Be highly responsive on chat apps during work hours, remote or not | Assume being physically present is optional even if your output is strong |
| Build guanxi (relationship capital) through face time — it matters for advancement | Underestimate how much in-person visibility factors into how you're evaluated |
| Clarify monitoring or tracking expectations upfront if working remotely | Be surprised if remote workdays are tracked more closely than in-office ones |
| Treat a remote-work allowance as a privilege that can be revoked | Assume a remote arrangement, once granted, is permanent or unquestioned |
British flexible work policy has moved from cultural preference to statutory floor in a short window. The Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 and its 2024 update mean requests can be made from an employee's very first day, and employers must point to one of a specific, limited set of business reasons to say no — a legal architecture that assumes flexibility is the default state to be argued away from, not the exception to be argued toward. According to the ONS, a quarter of British workers now operate hybrid, concentrated heavily in information and professional services, where the work itself doesn't require physical presence to get done.
The preference data reinforces the policy: 87 percent of UK employees say they prefer hybrid or remote arrangements, and a striking 45 percent say they would take a pay cut to protect that flexibility. Hofstede's individualism score for the UK sits at 89, among the highest in the world, and the remote-work regime fits that profile neatly — an assumption that autonomous, self-directed employees can be trusted to manage their own time without direct supervision.
Chinese workplace culture starts from close to the opposite assumption. Hofstede scores China at just 20 on individualism, reflecting a workplace built around group cohesion, hierarchy, and guanxi — the relationship capital built substantially through physical presence and face time that is difficult to replicate over a screen. The pandemic forced an experiment nobody had asked for, and the results were not encouraging for remote work's reputation: many employees reported that working from home simply extended the workday, as delayed digital communication, no formal lunch break, and "heavier than a mountain" KPIs combined to make home the worse version of the office rather than a liberation from it.
The Morning Brief
Enjoying this? Get it in your inbox.
Trust, or its absence, shows up structurally too. Some companies deployed monitoring software and "work diaries" to verify remote employees were actually working, a level of oversight that would read as faintly insulting in a British hybrid-work policy but reflects a management culture where visible presence has long been the primary proxy for effort and loyalty. China's 996 culture was formally ruled illegal by authorities in 2021, but the post-pandemic return to office reportedly arrived with heavier workloads attached, not lighter ones — remote work's brief moment did not translate into a lasting shift in what "committed" is assumed to look like.
The UK's flexible-work regime assumes that autonomy and output can be separated from physical presence, and builds legal protection around that assumption. China's remote-work hesitance assumes the opposite — that presence itself is doing real relational and evaluative work that a video call cannot replace. Neither assumption is simply wrong; they're calibrated to genuinely different definitions of what a workplace is for. The British definition is largely transactional: show up to produce the agreed output. The Chinese definition is more relational: show up to be part of the group that produces it together.
The friction point for anyone relocating is expectation mismatch, not policy mismatch. A British employee moving to a Chinese office who assumes their remote-work habits will simply transfer will find those habits read, however unfairly, as a lack of commitment. A Chinese employee moving to a British office who assumes physical presence is the main signal of dedication may spend months over-indexing on office face time that nobody there is actually tracking.
r/expats — A British consultant relocated to Shanghai described requesting one remote day a week, a request that would have been unremarkable in London, and being told gently but clearly that it "wasn't really how things worked" at his new firm, despite no written policy actually forbidding it.
Quora — Someone who'd worked remotely for a Chinese company from abroad wrote that trust had to be earned through relentless responsiveness on messaging apps, describing an unspoken expectation to reply within minutes during work hours regardless of what the contract said about flexible scheduling.
TeamBlind — A tech worker who'd moved from a UK firm to a China-based one posted that the surveillance software tracking his remote workdays felt invasive at first, but he came to understand it as the company's substitute for the informal trust that in-person presence would otherwise have built.
Internations Shanghai — A European expat manager noted that her Chinese team members who did work remotely tended to stay logged into chat apps well past normal hours, something she initially read as overwork but later understood as a visible signal of commitment that had simply migrated online rather than disappeared.
r/AskEurope — A British worker who'd briefly worked with a Chinese partner office described the culture clash bluntly: his side treated a lack of messages as a sign a colleague was focused and trusted to work independently, while his Chinese counterparts treated the same silence as a sign something might be wrong.
If you're moving to the UK, expect flexible and remote work to be the default conversation opener, not a special favor to be earned — use the legal right to request it, and don't over-apologize for wanting it. If you're moving to China, assume physical presence still carries real professional weight even where remote policies technically exist, and build your reputation through visible availability before you try to negotiate away from it. The honest version: in Britain, trust is assumed until your output says otherwise; in China, trust is often built face to face first, and the flexibility comes later, if it comes at all.
Subscriber Only
Subscribe to The Alignment Times and get every article delivered to your inbox.
Priya Mehta
Staff writer covering financial markets and corporate strategy. Has strong opinions about spreadsheets.