🇵🇰 Pakistan 🇮🇹 Italy By Suki Nakamura, Out of Office
Every culture has decided, independently and with great confidence, that its way of finding a romantic partner is simply "normal" and everyone else's is a quaint local custom worth a paragraph in a guidebook. Having relocated through enough of them to lose count, I can report that there is no normal. There is only who, precisely, you are expected to answer to before you're allowed to fall in love.
Pakistan and Italy sit on opposite ends of a spectrum you wouldn't expect to have two ends, given that both are, broadly, family-first, socially conservative-leaning, deeply relationship-oriented cultures. And yet one runs courtship through formal family channels with the procedural rigour of a merger negotiation, and the other runs it through a loud, performative, group-based social theatre where the "date" is really a four-hour group dinner that may or may not eventually produce a couple. Neither involves two people quietly getting a coffee and seeing how it goes. I wish someone had told me that before I tried it in both places.
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Understand that "meeting the family" often comes before, not after, a relationship is official | Assume Western-style casual dating translates directly, even in cosmopolitan Karachi or Lahore |
| Respect that public displays of affection are read very differently than at home | Treat a group outing with cousins present as a chaperone problem rather than the actual format |
| Let intentions be clear early — ambiguity is read as disrespect, not mystery | Discuss a budding relationship loudly in public, regardless of how private you think the venue is |
| Learn the difference between formally "introduced" and casually "met" — they carry different weight | Mistake family involvement for a lack of personal agency in the people involved |
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Expect to meet the friend group, the cousins, and possibly a grandmother within weeks | Suggest a quiet one-on-one dinner as date one — the group aperitivo is date one |
| Dress with actual effort, every time, including to the supermarket | Underestimate how much of "dating" is actually "being evaluated by everyone present" |
| Let conversation run long, loud, and theatrical — it's affection, not conflict | Rush toward exclusivity-defining conversations; ambiguity is tolerated far longer than elsewhere |
| Accept that your partner's mother will have opinions about your cooking, immediately | Assume a lively argument at dinner means the evening has gone badly |
Dating in Pakistan, particularly outside the small bubble of ultra-Westernised urban elites that foreign media loves to photograph, doesn't really happen the way the word implies elsewhere. What exists instead is a spectrum running from fully arranged introductions, through family-vetted "proposals," to the semi-clandestine phone-and-message relationships that educated young professionals in Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad conduct with the genuine conviction that nobody's noticed, while every aunt within three degrees of separation has, in fact, noticed completely.
Gallup Pakistan's own survey work on marriage and courtship confirms what anyone living there for six months already suspects: family involvement isn't a conservative inconvenience bolted onto an otherwise Western process, it's the actual architecture the process runs on. Parents aren't chaperones standing awkwardly at the edge of young love — in the traditional model, they're closer to co-negotiators, and in the modern urban hybrid model, they're the audience whose eventual approval determines whether a relationship gets to exist publicly at all. A foreigner walking in assuming dating is a private two-person activity that family finds out about later is making the single most common and most socially costly mistake available.
What surprised me more than the formality was the sincerity underneath it. Once intentions are declared — and they are declared, explicitly, with none of the ambiguous "talking stage" purgatory the West has perfected — the relationship that follows tends to carry a seriousness and directness that casual dating cultures rarely produce. You are not required to guess where you stand. You are required to be ready for everyone to know where you stand, immediately, which is its own kind of terrifying.
The Morning Brief
Enjoying this? Get it in your inbox.
Italy's dating culture performs the opposite trick: it looks, from the outside, exactly like the loose, flirtatious, individually-driven Southern European romance of cinema, and functions, on the inside, as a deeply collective activity that simply never admits to being one. The first "date" is rarely a date. It's an aperitivo with six people, three of whom are childhood friends of your intended, one of whom is a cousin who happens to be free that evening, and all of whom are quietly assessing you over spritz and olives while the actual object of your interest says surprisingly little.
Istat's demographic data shows Italians marrying later and dating longer than most of their Northern European neighbours, and having lived through the process, I'd argue the group-evaluation stage is a meaningful chunk of why. You're not being assessed by one person deciding if they like you. You're being assessed by an entire social ecosystem deciding if you fit into it, and that process — loud, warm, theatrical, utterly exhausting if you're not prepared for it — takes considerably longer than a Tinder-and-two-dates courtship anywhere else.
The theatricality itself is sincere, not performative-in-the-cynical-sense. The volume at the dinner table, the hand gestures, the apparent argument about whether the pasta was cooked correctly — none of it is relationship conflict. It's the baseline operating temperature of Italian social life, and foreigners who read loudness as hostility will spend their entire stay flinching at affection. Once you stop flinching, it's genuinely, disarmingly warm. It's just warm at a volume that would get the police called in most other countries.
Pakistan asks you to be serious immediately and public gradually. Italy asks you to be public immediately and serious gradually. Both, infuriatingly, are more honest about what's actually happening than the Western model that pretends dating is a private experiment between two consenting adults when it is, everywhere, always, a negotiation with the people around them too — Pakistan and Italy have simply stopped pretending otherwise. If I had to pick a winner for sheer efficiency, Pakistan's directness about intentions saves everyone months of ambiguity. If I had to pick a winner for sheer enjoyment of the process itself, Italy's four-hour group dinners are, infuriatingly, some of the best evenings I've had anywhere. Suki does not do ties. Italy wins, on the sole technicality that at least the food is good while you're being evaluated.
Reddit r/Pakistan — "Foreign guy asked me why his Pakistani girlfriend's brother kept texting him. Nobody told him the brother was basically a co-signer on the whole relationship."
Quora — "I went to what I thought was a date in Milan. There were seven people. I was the only one who thought it was a date. We're married now, for what it's worth."
Internations Lahore — "The hardest adjustment wasn't the rules, it was realising the rules were never a secret. Everyone just assumed I already knew them."
The mistake foreigners make in both countries is the same mistake, just mirrored: assuming the visible social performance is a barrier standing between you and the "real" relationship underneath. In Pakistan, the family isn't standing between you and love — they're part of how love gets built there, formally, deliberately, with everyone's eyes open. In Italy, the group dinner isn't standing between you and romance — it is romance, conducted at volume, with extra courses. Stop looking for the quiet two-person version you were promised by every other culture you've lived in. It was never coming, and honestly, you're better off without it.
Subscriber Only
Subscribe to The Alignment Times and get every article delivered to your inbox.
Photo by Askar Abayev via Pexels
Suki Nakamura
Staff writer covering financial markets and corporate strategy. Has strong opinions about spreadsheets.