🇺🇦 Ukraine vs 🇵🇰 Pakistan — Healthcare and Expat Medical Culture
By Suki Nakamura, Out of Office
Nothing sharpens your opinions about a country's institutions quite like needing one of them at 2am, and I've had the specific misfortune of testing both Ukrainian and Pakistani healthcare systems under circumstances I will not be elaborating on, except to say that both times, the private clinic saved me and the public system was never seriously considered as an option.
Ukraine's healthcare system is a Soviet-era structure mid-renovation, straining under a war that has damaged hospitals and logistics in ways that go well beyond ordinary underfunding, propped up by a genuinely capable private tier serving those who can pay. Pakistan's system never had the Soviet chassis to renovate in the first place — it built modern private excellence in its major cities almost entirely in parallel to, rather than instead of, a public system that remains badly under-resourced. Both countries will treat you superbly if you have insurance and a good clinic on speed dial. Neither will pretend the public alternative is a serious option for anyone with a choice.
🇺🇦 Ukraine
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Get comprehensive private health insurance before you need it | Assume the state system will be quick, modern, or lightly bureaucratic |
| Register as a resident to access state-funded basic care as a backup | Rely on public healthcare for anything beyond emergency stabilisation |
| Use trusted private centres like the American Medical Center or Medikom | Expect uniform care quality outside Kyiv and other major cities |
| Factor evacuation insurance into any policy, given the current situation | Ignore how the ongoing conflict has damaged hospital logistics nationwide |
🇵🇰 Pakistan
| ✅ Do | ❌ Don't |
|---|---|
| Use private hospitals like Aga Khan University Hospital for serious care | Expect public hospitals to be anything but overcrowded and under-resourced |
| Get insurance that includes medical evacuation for major procedures | Assume hygiene standards are consistent across private facilities |
| Rely on employer or diplomatic-mission insurance if it's offered | Treat routine vaccinations against malaria and TB as optional precautions |
| Stick to well-reviewed private clinics in Islamabad, Karachi, or Lahore | Wander into an unfamiliar private clinic without checking its reputation first |
Ukraine's healthcare system was already mid-transformation before 2022 — moving, slowly and unevenly, from its Soviet-era structure toward something closer to a modern European model, with state-funded care for citizens and registered residents sitting alongside a private tier for those who want speed and comfort. Then the war arrived, and continued, and the damage to hospitals and medical logistics nationwide has been severe enough that "under-resourced" now undersells what the public system is actually contending with.
For expats, the practical calculus hasn't changed even as the context has become far more serious: legally registered residents who pay into the system can access public healthcare, and in genuine emergencies, anyone gets treated regardless of insurance status, but ongoing or elective treatment essentially requires private cover or the ability to pay directly. The private tier in Kyiv — places like the American Medical Center, Medikom, and Oxford Medical Clinic — remains genuinely excellent, staffed by direct, outcomes-focused doctors operating in modern facilities, and it's where every sensible expat I know routes their care by default. What's changed is the margin for error: evacuation insurance, once a nice-to-have for the cautious, is now close to essential, given how unevenly damaged infrastructure and logistics have become outside the capital. Ukrainian hospitality shows up here too, oddly — even under enormous strain, the warmth and directness of Ukrainian medical staff toward patients, expat or otherwise, has been remarked on by nearly everyone I know who's needed care there, which says something quietly remarkable about the people even as the system around them buckles.
The Morning Brief
Enjoying this? Get it in your inbox.
Pakistan's healthcare landscape didn't evolve from a single system splitting into public and private tiers so much as it grew two entirely separate systems side by side, and expats quickly learn there's really only one of them worth using. Public healthcare spending remains low, government facilities are frequently overcrowded and inefficient, and while the private sector shoulders most of the country's actual healthcare burden, it does so at real cost and with regulation that's charitably described as inconsistent.
The upside — and it's a genuine one — is that Pakistan's major cities have built private medical infrastructure that competes credibly with much wealthier countries: Aga Khan University Hospital and the Seventh Day Adventist Hospital in Karachi, Shifa International and the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences in Islamabad, all offering modern facilities and genuinely skilled specialists, provided you can pay or you're covered. Most expats employed by multinational firms or diplomatic missions arrive with comprehensive insurance already arranged, and the smart ones make sure that coverage includes medical evacuation abroad, because for anything sufficiently serious, the local advice — even from Pakistani doctors themselves — is often simply to fly out. Hygiene standards vary more than newcomers expect even within the private sector, so reputation-checking a clinic before you need it, rather than during an emergency, is not optional diligence, it's basic self-preservation. Add in real regional disease risks like malaria and tuberculosis, and the message is consistent: private care here is excellent, but you build your own safety net, because nobody else is building it for you.
Ukraine's system is a genuinely good structure under genuinely terrible strain; Pakistan's system was never structurally unified to begin with, but its private tier has had decades of stability to mature into something reliably excellent for those who can afford it. If I had to choose which country's private healthcare I'd trust with something serious today, Pakistan's Aga Khan network edges it, purely because it isn't operating inside an active war. But Ukraine's medical staff, doing genuinely heroic work against circumstances no healthcare system should have to absorb, deserve the last word here more than the ranking does.
Reddit r/expats — paraphrased: an expat in Kyiv describing how quickly "nice-to-have" evacuation coverage became "non-negotiable" over the past few years
Quora — paraphrased: a Karachi-based expat explaining that word-of-mouth, not star ratings, is how you actually find a trustworthy private clinic
expat.com Ukraine forum — paraphrased: a longtime resident noting that even under enormous pressure, private clinic staff never lost their bedside manner
Neither of these countries will let you coast on the public system, and both will reward you generously for taking private insurance seriously before, not after, you need it. Pakistan's version of this lesson comes from decades of underinvestment in public care; Ukraine's comes from a war actively reshaping what "healthcare access" even means in real time. Whichever one you're relocating to, do the unglamorous admin work first: find the clinic, check the coverage, confirm the evacuation clause. It's the least interesting sentence in this entire column, and the only one that actually matters.
Subscriber Only
Subscribe to The Alignment Times and get every article delivered to your inbox.
Photo by World Sikh Organization of Canada via Pexels
Suki Nakamura
Staff writer covering financial markets and corporate strategy. Has strong opinions about spreadsheets.